Have you ever purchased an item of equipment that you thought could come in very handy only to leave it lying around for months because you could not work out how to set it up? Or not set all the features up, because it would have taken hours to read through the manual, which looked as if it had been translated by a machine anyway?
Many individuals have experienced the situation at some time or another. I had an alarm clock once that had dozens of features like waking me up at diverse times on the weekend to during the week and randomly selecting a radio channel every day to wake me up. It also had a feature with which I could train it to understand some voice commands, but I could not be concerned with all that.
I just wanted it to wake me up whenever I set it. Video recorders are similar devices. How many times do you hear of people setting their video recorder to record a film only to get a documentary on another channel? It used to occur a lot, did it not?
The aspect that I am getting at here is that the designers of these instruments have been told to put as many features as possible into them up to a price in order to be all things to all people. However, in making their equipment so convoluted, a lot of people decide not to bother using them at all and will avoid that make in the future, which is the exact opposite of what the manufacturers meant.
The next time you go out looking for some electronic gadget, you will say to yourself: “Oh, So-And-So, you need a degree to use one by So-And-So. I’m not buying one of those”.
So how can this concern you? Well, if you have to coordinate anything that you want others to take part in or be animated about, try not to make it excessively complex. I am not saying ‘dumb-down’, just don’t show off by putting all the bells and whistles on it merely to show that you can do that. People will not thank you for it, they will ignore your undertaking.
This has a lot of implications for on line projects where individuals can be hundreds of miles apart but still be working together on a joint project from home. Open source programming is a good example of this type of work. The team leaders should keep everything as simple as possible if they want the maximum co-operation.
One technique that you can use to check to see if your project is being understood is to ask. It sounds obvious and it should be, but a lot of team leaders will not ask because they think that it makes them look weak and unknowledgable. Again, in fact, the opposite is true. A good team leader is not a despot; a good team leader is a good organizer and is thoughtful.
If you are interested in learning more about team-building, then visit our website entitled Team Building to learn more.